Search the Age UK blog
- RT @churchpoverty: Prepay meters hit the poorest hardest (via @guardian) ow.ly/P8mW5 - see our research on this at http://t.co/f… 1 day ago
- Rosamund Urwin: We should all be helping to care for the lonely elderly. @age_uk mentioned via @EveningStandard bit.ly/1KxbUdH 1 day ago
- RT @BBCNews: Pre-pay energy customers pay an average £226 a year more than cheapest direct debit tariff, @CitizensAdvice says http://t.co/r… 1 day ago
- Age International
- Age UK
- Christopher Brooks
- José Luis Iparraguirre
- Judith Escribano
- Katherine Hill
- Lizzie Feltoe
- Lucy Malenczuk
- Sally West
- Stephen Lowe
- Tom Gentry
- Autumn Statement Campaigning care homes Care in Crisis Commission on Improving Dignity in Care Communities and inclusion Conferences Consumers Digital inclusion Economy Employment Energy Energy Bill Revolution Equality and Human Rights General General Election 2015 Government Health Health and Wellbeing Home and Care Housing Income International Money Matters Public Policy Research Social care Spread the Warmth campaign Transport Work and Learning
Author Archives: janevass
Posted on August 28, 2014
Posted on April 26, 2013
Each year, Age UK stands back and takes an overview of how society is meeting the needs of people in later life and sets out our agenda for public policy in the year ahead. In our Agenda for Later Life 2013 report we track changes in a range of key areas including money matters, work and learning and health and social care.
Public attitudes, policies and the economy all impact on people’s experiences of ageing. This year, as the economy bumps along the bottom, it would be all too easy to concentrate on the challenges we face. However, we strongly believe in the need to focus on the opportunities as well.
The publication of a White Paper setting out plans for a new single tier State Pension brings hope of better provision in future for those with low incomes and interrupted working lives. Continue reading →
Posted on April 2, 2013
All too often, our ageing population is represented as an unmitigated disaster for the nation and the words ‘ticking timebomb’ appear with monotonous regularity.
A new report from the House of Lords Select Committee on Public Service and Demographic Change offers a refreshing change of perspective. It recognises that ‘longer lives represent progress, and the changes do not mean a great economic or general fiscal crisis’. But it also sets out a number of challenges facing us – and some thoughtful solutions for change.
The Committee, chaired by Lord Filkin, called the nation ‘woefully unprepared’ for the changes ahead and recommended a number of actions for all of us. The Government is challenged to set out its vision for public services in an ageing society in a White Paper.
In particular, the report rightly recognises the increased strain on health and social care and calls for greater integration and much more focus on prevention, early diagnosis and managing long-term conditions, with patients fully engaged in decision-making. Age UK agrees. Continue reading →
Posted on March 20, 2013
Following statements from the Chancellor prior to the budget, it seemed that older people were due to benefit from significant changes to the future funding structures of social care and pensions. However, following the Chancellor’s statement there is little new to celebrate.
The main point of interest for pensioners was confirmation that the implementation of the cap on social care costs (the ‘Dilnot’ reforms) and the introduction of the single-tier state pension will both be brought forward to 2016-17. From April 2016, there will be a cap of £72,000 on the costs of care, and the upper threshold limit for the residential care means test will be increased to £118,000.
Whilst we welcome the earlier implementation of the care costs cap and the higher upper means test threshold from April 2016, this will do nothing to help the 800,000 older people who need help with everyday tasks but receive no formal state support. Since 2010/11, in real terms £700 million has been cut from local authority spending on social care. Although the Government has provided additional investment for social care over the course of this parliament, it has not been enough to halt the downwards spiral in care funding. As a result, 85 per cent of local authorities now provide care only to people with substantial or critical needs.
Continue reading →