Margaret (not her real name) has been married for over 30 years. She worked part-time for many years but this work was low paid, and only during teaching terms, so she never built up her record of NI contributions.
During periods of unemployment Margaret did not claim benefits (and therefore credits which would have counted towards her NI record) because her husband was working. Margaret gave up work to look after her husband when he became chronically ill to help him remain working for as long as possible.
They felt they could manage without claiming carer’s benefits (which again would have protected her NI record), but when he did eventually have to give up work as his condition worsened they made sure that he claimed incapacity benefit, purely so that his NI contributions—and therefore, they thought, Margaret’s pension—would be protected.
Margaret’s husband will reach pension age under the present system, with a full contribution record, which they were always promised would also cover Margaret. However at 59 Margaret finds that the pension she had relied upon will no longer exist.
In a surprise announcement at the start of 2014 David Cameron, the Prime Minister, said that maintaining the ‘triple lock’ for the basic state pension will be a key part of the Conservative’s next election manifesto. This would mean that, at least until 2020, the basic state pension would be increased annually by the rise in prices, earnings or 2.5 per cent – whichever is higher. In response the Labour leader Ed Miliband has also said he is committed to the triple lock.
Reaction has been variable. Some newspapers immediately suggested this would affect other benefits such as the winter fuel payment – the Daily Mail’s headline was ‘Turmoil over OAP benefits’. The Independent welcomed the announcement but said it does not go far enough pointing out that the basic pension is still only £110 a week.
Alternatively, others have focussed on what this means for younger people with the Intergenerational Foundation stating the move is unaffordable and ‘betrays’ the younger generation. Continue reading
Posted in Consumers, Government, Income, Money Matters
Tagged Age UK, Age UK blog, Ageing, ageing population, ageing society, Coalition Government, Conservative election manifesto, Conservativr election manifesto pensions, David Cameron pensions, David Cameron triple-lock, general election, general election 2015, Government, Incomes, money matters, older people, pensions, pensions triple lock, state pension, triple-lock, universal be, value of state pension triple lock
We are “woefully underprepared” for our ageing society. That was the conclusion of the House of Lords Select Committee chaired by Lord Filkin earlier in the year.
Central to that is the fact that people just aren’t saving enough for retirement and their later life. New polling Age UK commissioned found that just under a quarter of people aged 50-64 - those rapidly approaching state pension age - think there’s no point saving. Worryingly, that’s not because the majority have
Tom Wright, Chief Executive of Age UK and Co-Chair of the Financial Services Commission
already made provision for their future. More than a quarter said they were worried about having enough to live on. Only 15 per cent thought they had saved enough already.
We also frequently hear from older people about the problems they face with money matters, and the lack of solutions that really work for older people. While auto-enrolment is a massive step forward, it will not have time to reap its full benefits for people close to retirement.
That’s why we’re launching the Financial Services Commission – which will be co-chaired by Tom Wright CEO of Age UK and Dr Alexander Scott of the Chartered Insurance Institute. Launching on December 5th, it will be take the form of a series of three summits in which we will work with key industry leaders and consumer experts to examine how to improve the “financial resilience” of older people – their ability to weather the challenges that might lie ahead. It will culminate in June next year with the publication of a roadmap of actions that regulators, government and industry need to take to help keep future and current pensioners financially resilient. Continue reading
Posted in Consumers, Money Matters, Financial Services Commission
Tagged older people, Age UK, pensions, older consumers, ageing society, money matters, Ageing, consumers, ageing population, Age UK blog, financial resilience, Financial Services Commission, Tom Wright Age UK, Tom Wright Chief Executive, Dr Alexander Scott Chartered Insurance Institute, Chartered Insurance Institute, improving financial resilience, improving the financial resilience of older people, boosting retirement income, retirement income, income in retirement, managing finances
This blog was contributed by Hannah Pearce, Age UK’s joint Head of Public Affairs.
The big headline in today’s autumn statement was the Chancellor’s announcement to increase state pension age. George Osborne said that state pension age would be set following a general principle by which people could expect to spend a third of their adult life in retirement. He declared that state pension age needs to keep up with life expectancy. On current assumptions, this would mean an increase to 68 in the mid 2030’s and 69 by the mid 2040’s. This follows a number of increases to State Pension Age in the last three Pensions Acts, the most recent of which speeded up equalisation so that women’s State Pension Age will increase to 65 between April 2016 and November 2018 and then to 66 for both men and women between December 2018 and October 2020. The current bill going through parliament proposes an increase to 67 between 2026 and 2028.
We have two broad concerns with this pronouncement. Firstly life expectancy figures on their own do not tell the whole story. Whilst life expectancy at birth (in England) for men is 83 the life expectancy gap – the gap between the highest and lowest life expectancy estimates by local authority is almost 9 years. The picture looks even worse when you examine healthy life expectancy which is only 64. And the male healthy life expectancy gap by local authority is over 15 years with Richmond at one of the scale where it is just over 70 compared to Manchester where it is just 55. Continue reading
Posted in Autumn Statement, Government
Tagged #AS2013, Age UK, Age UK blog, Ageing, ageing population, ageing society, Autumn Statement, Autumn Statement 2013, Chancellor's Autumn Statement, George Osborne, Government, Hannah Pearce Age UK, how will the autumn statement affect older people, older people, older people autumn statement, pensions, Pensions Bill, what the autumn statement means for older people