Lifetime neighbourhoods – a lifetime away?

Photo: Yaili via Flickr
Image from yaili via flickr
I live in a small town in Hampshire. When I leave my front gate, I walk along a pavement which is the responsibility of Hampshire County Council. The bus stop is the responsibility of the borough council – but the bus service is run by a private company, with funding from central government. I may cut through a local footpath which is maintained by the town council to shops which are run by private companies and pop in for a cup of coffee at the community hall which is owned and run by a committee of volunteers.

So if I wanted to improve my neighbourhood – who would I talk to?

Way back in 2007, the last government produced a discussion paper called ‘Towards lifetime neighbourhoods’. It explored the need for neighbourhoods ‘which offer everyone the best possible chance of health, wellbeing, and social, economic and civic engagement regardless of age.’ This led to a ‘national strategy’ for lifetime homes and neighbourhoods published in 2008.

Given the political upheavals of the last 12 months, it’s not surprising that both these documents have now been confined to the archives. But what of the concept? Where are lifetime neighbourhoods going now?

A recent paper from the International Longevity Centre (ILC) on ‘Localism and Neighbourhoods for All Ages’ asks why it has been so hard, under both the previous and the current governments, to bring about lifetime neighbourhoods. This is absolutely the right question to be asking.

And in particular, why neighbourhoods have been so hard to tackle, compared to progress on lifetime homes – despite the fact that research (quoted in the report) shows that the percentage of older people who are dissatisfied with their area remains significantly higher than those who are dissatisfied with their home.

The ILC report suggests two reasons: that more specific criteria for lifetime neighbourhoods are needed, and that we need further evidence of the benefits. I would add one more.

As a campaigner, my instinct is to analyse the power structures and ask the question: who can deliver? This leads me to the conclusion that one powerful reason why there has been so little progress on bringing about lifetime neighbourhoods is that there are so many different agencies involved.

Which brings me back to my front door and that walk into town, using the services and infrastructure provided by at least half a dozen different organisations. If I wanted to improve things – who would I talk to?

At Age UK, we believe that local councillors have a unique role to play here. Within their ward, councillors have both the local knowledge of the area and the electoral mandate to take action

This week, we launch our new Pride of Place campaign for better neighbourhoods. We are calling on all local councillors to show their commitment to improving neighbourhoods for older people by signing up with us as Pride of Place advocates.

We’ll keep you posted about how we get on.

4 thoughts on “Lifetime neighbourhoods – a lifetime away?”

  1. Here in Whitchurch, Hampshire, there is a group of volunteers who are just getting underway on a community plan, with support from the local town council. It may be one way to get items needing attention visible locally – with particular attention being given to it by the local borough Council. e.g. event notice from their March meeting… Community Plan Meeting


  2. Thanks, Andrew. I think the kind of thing that’s happening in Whitchurch is a really good way of highlighting issues of concern and I’d encourage you to make sure that the views of a wide range of older people are included. But the problem for many local communities is not having the capacity to do this kind of thing. That’s why we feel there is a particular role for local councillors to play – because every neighbourhood has a councillor, elected by and accountable to local people. There are many different ways of trying to achieve change in neighbourhoods – the important thing is to get on and make some of them work!

  3. Agree with the comments, and besides the positive work at the “hyper local level” many questions remain as to how localities think longer term and holistically in respect to spatial planning, rural & urban regeneration, housing growth policies etc…”the big ticket” planning directions!
    Have seen well intended local spatial planning, housing & regeneration strategies that do not pay sufficient attention to the impact of the ageing population, aware of examples locally where these key strategies do not even make the link to local overarching Ageing Well strategies.
    How we provide an ageing perspective to the wider planning that localities undertake is important, all part of the cultural recalibrating of approaches, (including the design and shape of our built environments & infrastructure, services & neighbourhoods).

  4. In Bradford we have some Parish Councillors within certain areas I have one in the locality where I live. I have an amount deducted in my Council Tax for this Council funding which I did object to. Do these Parish Councillors work well and have we taken on board all the potential. At meetings we have to listen most of the time but I think more allowed time should be given to people to speak and also be encouraged to do so but also be aware that some people make a point quickly whilst others do elaborate ratrher long.

Leave a Reply to Mary Milne Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s