Little progress on pensioner poverty

The annual poverty figures came out earlier this month covering the last year of the Labour government – 2009-10.  For those who love figures, Households Below Average Income is a must-read – over 250 pages with some 150 detailed tables.

Within this mass of numbers are the key headline poverty rates. For older people there is no change in the most commonly used measure. This defines poverty as income of less than 60% of median (typical) household income after housing costs. On this basis shockingly there are still 1.8 million (16%) of pensioners living in poverty. Levels are even higher when measured before housing costs although at least these showed a fall from 2.3 million to 2.1 million since the previous year.

The poverty figures are however considerably lower than when Labour came into power in 1997. At that time 2.9 million pensioners were in poverty (after housings costs). There was rapid progress in the early years of the 21st century with poverty rates falling by over 1 million by 2005-06. This was at least partly due to the introduction of pension credit and other more generous benefits for older people. And while a minimum level of income is essential it is not the only factor that contributes to standard of living.

This year the report includes a useful new measure of material deprivation for pensioners. Material deprivation is measured by asking people if they have particular items, or can do certain things, that most people consider essential. For example this includes having a damp-free home or being able to replace a cooker if it broke down. If people answer no then the reasons why are explored. Under this measure 9% of people aged 65+ are in material deprivation. Interestingly there is little overlap between income poverty and material deprivation among pensioners, suggesting these are somewhat different but complementary measures of disadvantage and exclusion.

So the Government has the tools to measure progress. It also made a good start when it came to power by announcing the restoration of the link between increases to the state basic pension and average earnings through the triple guarantee. But this will take time to have an impact and for some, gains will be outweighed by other changes such as a lower level of winter fuel payments and a change to the index used to uprate the state additional pension and some other benefits. The Coalition Government has a radical reform agenda including proposals for state pension reform for future pensioners. We are still waiting for a plan to show how poverty among current older people is going to be reduced and abolished.

4 thoughts on “Little progress on pensioner poverty”

  1. This government has not only betrayed existing pensioners with this new pension scheme, it’s about to hit some pensioner couples who are also receiving Pension Credit, if an amendment in the Welfare Reform Bill goes
    through parliament in it’s present form, see below.

    Welfare Reform Bill Explanatory Notes:
    Page 22 145. Paragraph 64 amends the State Pension Credit Act 2002 so that a member of a couple who has attained the qualifying age for state pension credit may not receive state pension credit if the other member of
    the couple has not attained that qualifying age. This is to ensure that all claimants who have not attained the qualifying age for state pension credit are required to claim universal credit and, if appropriate, be subject to
    work-related conditions of entitlement. Single people will still be able to claim Pension Credit when they reach qualifiying age.

    At the moment I receive Pension Credit but it looks as though this will change soon as my wife is ten years younger than myself and with her retirement age going up we will not qualify again until I am 76, this makes for a poverty stricken retirement.
    Thanks a lot Cameron!!!

  2. l live on £160 per week very hard gas electric water can l get any more help
    l wrote to david camoron,his secretary wrote back and said the priminster does not
    answer letters of ordernary people that’s why we vote for the other side
    when ever we can Jason Holmes .

Leave a Reply to Daney Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s