The costs of demographic change – an EU obsession?

 The European Union’s massive 2012 Ageing Report, published on 15 May and promptly endorsed by national governments, warns darkly of the impact of demographic change in driving up age-related public expenditure, and undermining the sustainability of government finances, in the context of the current financial crisis.

The same themes run through a lot of recent EU work – President Barroso’s EU2020 strategy, the 2012 Annual Growth Survey, and this spring’s Pensions White Paper.  

Ambitiously presenting a projection for 2010-2060, the 2012 Ageing report suggests that “age-related expenditure” will increase by 4.1% of GDP, counting pensions (+1.5%), health expenditure (+1.5%), and long term care (+1.1%).   Altogether, age-related expenditure accounts for 25% of GDP, and about 50% of general government expenditure, so we are talking big stuff, and small adjustments can have big consequences.

The EU seems to focus almost obsessively on demographic projections.  The numbers of Europeans over 65 will double by 2060, from 87.5m to 152.6m, and the 85+ will triple from 23.7m to 62.4m.   But the report does not acknowledge that the older people of 2060 are children today. When we reach 2060, will they have the same needs as older people today?   Will they have the same demands on public expenditure?   These are unknowns, so projecting from today’s needs seems inherently flawed. 

The age dependency ratio, which the EU  solemnly shows as doubling by 2060 (from four working age people to two, to every ‘retired’ person), assumes that those aged 20-64 are active in the labour market and that the 65+ are passive and dependent. 

But older people today contribute greatly to their communities as volunteers, to their families as grandparents, and to the economy as consumers. The EC makes no attempt to monetize these contributions – let alone project them over the next 50 years – so they are not included in their calculations. It is naive and one-sided to talk of the dependency ratio, without understanding these important contributions.

Looking forward, the increasing dependency the EU fears could be mitigated by smarter policies to promote  working longer prevent illness and reduce care needs. 

Economic growth, the answer to everyone’s prayers, will not flow from its historical engine – an increase in the number of young workers entering employment.   Instead we have to invest in the productivity of our existing labour force, and grow the silver economy by designing better products and services for older people.  The proposed European Accessibility Act is an opportunity to do this.

The EU’s 2012 Ageing Report is a proper call to action, but it should not drive cuts in health and pensions spending.   Other smarter policies can help manage demographic change and give Europeans the opportunity to live longer, more fullfilled lives which our ancestors would never have dreamed possible.

Find out more about Age UK’s European work

Read another blog contributed by Mervyn Kohler

 

 

 

3 responses to “The costs of demographic change – an EU obsession?

  1. It is amazing that pension ages are being raised so we have to work longer but at the same time we are regarded as going completely ga ga as soon as we reach age 65. There’s a real gap here – we need to change perceptions about the contribution that us older folk make to the economy.

    Rosemary
    http://www.grandmasfootsteps.com

  2. Apart from the pay more and the receive less there was also the work longer from the government. There was the outcry of whether you would really want your children taught by someone aged 68 or whether prison officers of the same age could realistically be expexted to perform effectively at the same age.
    Afterwards and independent of this was the government plan to make it very easy to just sack people.
    Now put the 2 together and you get those who have spent their lifetime in their profession, struggling ‘past their sell by date’ being denied a dignified retirement at the right time and instead being rewarded with the sack as no longer fit for purpose.

  3. Pingback: EY2012 – a happy and glorious year for older Europeans? | Age UK Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s