Government responds to the Francis Inquiry

The first inquiry into Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust  catalogued extensive examples of neglectful care and appalling patient experiences. Stories of people being ignored, dehydrated, abused were visible signs of an organisation that had forgotten basic principles of care and at worst, wilfully put organisational considerations ahead of patients. Many, if not most, of the patients involved were older people.

The second inquiry reported in February and included 290 recommendations
that could help to avoid the same situation arising again, not just in Staffordshire, but throughout the NHS. You can see what we said about it in our blog. 440x210_care_home

The government yesterday gave its response to the report in a paper titled Patients first and foremost, and there’s much to be positive about in what it says.

The paper outlines changes to how services are regulated, reflecting an on-going review by the health and care regulator the Care Quality Commission (CQC). It describes much wider use of expert inspectors in hospitals including members of the public that bring expertise derived from their experience of care.

There will be better information for the public in the form of a ratings systems for hospitals so people will have a much clearer picture about the quality of care. This could be a tool for helping people to choose where they are cared for but also a driver for under-performing hospitals.

There will be a chief inspector of hospitals and a set of fundamental standards that care settings must not dip below. Failing managers could be barred from taking up posts in other parts of the NHS.

These system-level changes are potentially useful, but there’s possibly more interesting territory in proposed changes to the education and development of care staff.

One of the big headlines on the morning of the report’s publication was the proposal to require nurse undergraduates receiving state supported education to undertake up to a year of support work similar to the role performed by healthcare assistants. This typically involves direct, hands-on care such as washing and supporting people to eat and drink. The paper leaves the door open to extend this to other NHS trainees (which we would strongly support).

The paper recognises that most health professionals will spend a large proportion, if not most, of their time caring for older people yet the skills acquired during education and training do not reflect this. It proposes strengthening the focus “on the complex physical and emotional needs of frail older people throughout nursing and other healthcare training”. This is long overdue and if implemented properly is potentially one of the most transformative aspects of the proposals.

These are all welcome and useful changes. As ever, it is only in implementation that their true value can be judged and we will expect rapid progress in the coming months, not least for the many older people that are in hospital right now and cannot wait for longer-term changes to take effect.

If there is something to criticise in the paper, it is perhaps that the content does not quite live up to the title. These are predominantly systems-level changes that will hopefully make it easier and quicker to detect and correct problems. However, what is less convincing is that the value of patients being “first and foremost” is truly recognised. I think few will read this paper and have any real sense of how healthcare based on partnership between individuals and those caring for them is going to be achieved.

Patient-centred care is not an end in itself – it is the means to achieving the best possible outcomes and at the very least a basic expectation. An NHS built on this principle is probably the best hope in preventing another Mid Staffordshire and for finally and comprehensively improving older people’s care.

In partnership with the NHS Confederation and the Local Government Group, Age UK launched the Dignity in Care Commission to drive improvements in the levels of care provided to older people in hospitals and care homes. Find out more about the work of the Dignity in Care Commission

Read another blog about the Francis Inquiry

5 responses to “Government responds to the Francis Inquiry

  1. I do hope it doesn’t lead to a nurses strike again.
    I think they ought to make doctors do a year of care work before they are allowed to train as doctors as well…wonder how that would go down with them – can barely lower themselves to speak to patients nowadays- too busy on Twitter and Facebook!

  2. this is what comes of those who dont work in the care industry coming up with what they say is revolutionary new measures (i.e. the Salmon report back in the 70s which resulted in more nursing staff having to do more office work and form filling) that took no notice of the hands on side of patient care. since then things have gradually got so that sisters and staff nurses are doing more and more paperwork and less and less patient care. i left nursing to start a family just before that report came in but met up with a sister i had worked with shortly after who told me it was terrible working with the restrictions that report put on them/even advised me not to go back to working in hospital.

  3. This is sadly a case of ‘if we change only what the front line does, then the fauly has been diagnosed as that is where the blame lies and nowhere else’. Is there no blame that can be attributed to any level above ? Are management just there to take out the eye watering salries but take no responsibility or blame for anything that has failed abysmally. Do not the undergraduates spend half their training time already in a hands on role in the hospital anyway. I dont know whether nurse graduates also have to spend the 9,000 a year of student loans to obtain their qualifications. If so would we then be relieving a basic wage employee of their basis roles so we could get the job done by an undergraduate trainee who would not only be doing it for nothing but paying out 9,000 out of their eventual own pocket for doing so. I really hope not.
    At the top, they took the big big money for running the hospitals but failed miserably. Time to go I think.

  4. a nurse friend of mine that i asked says yes,nurse trainees are treated exactly same as any other university student.so will have to get student loans towards their fees
    plus,without knowing about your comment dhughes, she said exactly the same as you. and she has just finished nursing last year.and was union rep.

  5. Why does it have to take 100’s to complain before problems are looked into, never mind sorted out. When one person makes a complaint such as in Mid Staffs, etc, this one complainant should be listened to and the complaint acted upon.
    The NHS is paid for by the general public, it is NOT A FREE service.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s